[2D-3D printing in hospital pharmacies, what roles and challenges?] / Impression 2D-3D dans les pharmacies hospitalières : quels rôles et quels challenges ?

The additive technology or 2D and 3D printing are increasingly used in various industrial fields, from aeronautics to mechanics but also in the fields of health such as dentistry or for bone reconstructions. These techniques have been studied for about fifteen years by the academic community in the pharmaceutical field (medical device and drug), and recently they have started to be applied to produce drugs in industry and in hospitals. Indeed, the Food and Drug Administration approved in August 2015 the marketing of the first drug printed by additive technique, then in 2018 the first clinical trial using 3D printed drugs was carried out in Great Britain by a hospital pharmacy. 2D-3D printing is presented as one of the tools of a more personalized medicine, the techniques of additive printing allowing the production of tabs containing several drugs in one tab (polypills) and the development of custom modified-releases drugs. This approach could allow better acceptance of the finished product and secure manufacturing. The objective of this work is to highlight relevant printing technologies for implementation in hospital pharmacies, and to see how these technologies could lead to a change in pharmaceutical practices, to improve patient care.

Organoids as preclinical models to improve intraperitoneal chemotherapy effectiveness for colorectal cancer patients with peritoneal metastases: Preclinical models to improve HIPEC.

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal metastases (PM), corresponding to tumor implants into the peritoneal cavity, are associated with impaired prognosis and low responsiveness to systemic chemotherapy. A new therapeutic approach has dramatically changed the prognosis of patients with PM from colorectal cancer (CRC), consisting in the association of a complete cytoreductive surgery followed by intraperitoneal chemotherapy associated to hyperthermia (HIPEC). Many drugs have been administered intraperitoneally, but no clear consensus has been approved. Therefore, relevant preclinical models are essentials for the efficient translation of treatments option into affected patients. METHOD: Organoids, the last generation of preclinical models, were used to rationalize and improve intraperitoneal chemotherapy. We tested several cytotoxics, combination, effect of hyperthermia, exposure duration and frequency. RESULTS: Organoids were a representative model of response to chemotherapies used for the treatment of PM from CRC; 460mg/m2 of oxaliplatin being the most efficient cytotoxic treatment. Repeated incubations with oxaliplatin; mimicking cycles of intraperitoneal treatment, resulted in an increased efficacy. CONCLUSION & DISCUSSION: Organoids are relevant models to study the chemosensitivity of peritoneal metastases from CRCs. These models could be used for large scale drug screening strategies or personalized medicine, for colorectal carcinoma but also for PM from other origins.

Use of 5-azacitidine for therapy-related myeloid neoplasms in patients with concomitant active neoplastic disease.

BACKGROUND: Patients diagnosed with therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (TRMN) with concomitant active neoplastic disorder (CAND) are usually proposed for best supportive care (BSC). We evaluated the feasibility of using 5-azacytidine (AZA) in this setting. METHODS: All patients referred to Gustave Roussy between 2010 and 2015 for TRMN diagnosis (less than 30% blast) and eligible for AZA treatment were included. Patients with CAND proposed for BSC were also described. Patient's outcomes were analyzed based on the presence or not of a CAND. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients with TRMN were analyzed, including 19 patients with CAND (14 eligible for AZA) and 33 without CAND eligible for AZA. The 5 patients with CAND ineligible for AZA had a worst performance status (p=0.016) at diagnosis and a shorter overall survival (OS) (0.62 months). Baseline characteristics of patients eligible for AZA were similar in the 2 groups except a trend for best performance status in patients with CAND (p=0.06). Overall response rate (71.4% vs 60.3%), transfusion independence (50.0% vs 45.5%) and OS (12.7 months vs 10.8 months) were similar between patients with and without CAND respectively (p=ns). CONCLUSION: Here we report the feasibility and efficacy of AZA for selected patients with TRMN and a CAND.